image stats
date added
previous votes
log in


indent register
indent recover

my balls lil larry

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
my balls lil larry

Comments for: my balls lil larry
FrostedApe Report This Comment
Date: July 06, 2008 03:21PM

It's hard to say which is more troubling, the fact that Larry has this many photos of his tiny penis, or the fact that it appears he managed to convince someone else to take several of them. Could have been on a timer, though.

"Hey, Larry, the game's on. You mind bringing me another beer?"
"Sure, Bob, but I would like you to take a few pictures of my tiny dick, first."
"Do I still get the beer?"
"As long as the pictures aren't blurry."
"Umm, OK, I guess, but how many do you really need? This is the fifth fucking weekend in a row. I'm just saying..."
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: July 07, 2008 06:15AM

Do you have any pictures of your dick? If so then why don't you put them here? If not then what are you afraid of? Are you afraid someone will make a snide remoark about you like you did?
FrostedApe Report This Comment
Date: July 08, 2008 11:41PM

Umm, no, because then I would be a lame fuck, too. See how that works? It's not really complicated.

But, just to show what a stand-up guy I am, I'm willing to make you a deal. YOU can browse all the tens of thousands of lame cock pictures on here, pick out whichever one you want, and then pretend that it's mine. Since this is your hobby, be sure you pick one that's really tiny, OK? I would be disappointed, otherwise.

If you want to start some kind of penis contest, you'll have to start without me. I'm quite happy with mine, and I don't need the approval of random strangers to make me feel better about it. I feel sorry for the people who do. If I can embarrass and humiliate them into stopping, I've done them a favor, whether they like it or not.
whohooooo Report This Comment
Date: July 09, 2008 12:47AM

Amen to that FrostedApe
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: July 15, 2008 07:53AM

This site is technically supposed to be for people to post their own pictures and not for stolen pictures from the internet. If people make snide comments on personal pics then people will not want to post them here which will be bad for all of us. We can all browse the internet and see pics from pornos and professional shots but we cannot see normal people everywhere. It is normal people we come into contact with everyday not just people with perfect bodies. If you don't have the guts to post nude pics of yourself here then you should keep you snide remarks to yourself and let those who do have the guts post pics of normal amature people. No guts no glory.
FrostedApe Report This Comment
Date: July 15, 2008 12:11PM


I've read a lot of your comments on other pictures and topics, and I think you and I would agree on most things, but this is going to have to be one that we don't. There's no argument that could change either of our minds, and that's OK.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: July 16, 2008 07:34AM

Can we agree that if a woman was browsing this sight and sees the jokes and snide remarks on these pics, she may not post her pics her for fear of being made fun of?
FrostedApe Report This Comment
Date: July 16, 2008 11:37AM

If "she" posts a bunch of pictures of "her" cock, I'm going to reserve the right to say something snide about it, or not, depending on how I feel. If she posts anything else, she's ugly, she's a cow, she's too skinny, her boobs are fake/ugly, she's underage, she's A MAN, or she's PHOTOSHOPPED, and if she's really and truly hideous and nasty, someone else will go into great detail about how hot she is, and all the things he would like to do to her. Those other comments aren't coming from me. I haven't done any statistical analysis of it, but my impression is that the good vs. bad comments are probably a wash.

Only about 5% of the viewers even bother to rate the pictures, way less than 1% make a comment, and a significant chunk of those comments are so illiterate, you can barely even make out what they're trying to say.

So, yeah, I would concede there must be some amount of leakage, a very small, but non-zero number of women who consider posting but ultimately decide not to, for fear of ridicule. I'm just saying, if your ego is too fragile to withstand a few incoherent comments from a couple of anonymous, 14-year-old potheads, you probably shouldn't post your pictures on something called "porn613".

I think this site is great. You get to see a lot of (mostly) great pictures, and not only vote on them, but comment on them, too. I don't know why more people don't take advantage of those two abilities. That's part of the fun.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: July 17, 2008 07:23AM

Then I guess you prefer the stolen pics over someone's own personel pics. Well I prefer amateurs over professional and if I see a thumnail of something I don't like I just skip over it instead of clicking it. I see no reason to click on a pic just to make a silly insulting comment about them. With all the camera phones and digital cameras around there should be more real photos here than staged stolen porfessional ones. By professional I mean anything from an established porn website.
FrostedApe Report This Comment
Date: July 17, 2008 11:33AM

"Stolen" vs. "personal" is completely irrelevant to me. Neither one is inherently better than the other. I prefer good pictures, wherever they come from, and the picture at the top of this page, for instance, isn't one of them. "Amateur" doesn't have to equal "crap", there's just a lot higher odds of it. Some people can't seem to figure out what the Delete key is for. The pictures, and the people in them, don't have to be perfect, but crap is crap, and its pro/am origin doesn't enter into it.

With digital and phone cams, photographs are essentially free, now. It's weird. It's like, since there's no expense involved, they have more value, now. They'll keep a crappy picture forever, (and inflict it on the whole world, via the Internet) when it's one they wouldn't have spent 15 cents to have developed, had it been taken on actual film.

I don't click on the thumbnails, generally. I leave the gallery page up. I click on the newest picture, which is the last one I have seen. Then I rate each one as it comes up, and that takes me to the next one. When the image number stops going up and goes to 1, I have seen all the new ones, and then I go back to the gallery and leave it there until the next time. Lather, rinse, repeat. For me, it's the easiest way to see the pictures, with the least amount of clicking. If one or two cock pictures pop up in the mix, I just click through them with the vote. I'm not interested, but no harm done. If there are 20+ in a row, of the same thing? Still no harm done,technically, but I'm going to be annoyed, and I may or may not say something snide about it, depending on just how annoyed I am at the moment.